Fundamentalism

A Societal Response to Fundamentalism



      Fundamentalism came on the scene of the early twentieth century as a reaction to liberal theology.  In both its offense and defense, fundamentalism aims to preserve conservative biblical Christianity and Christian doctrine.  Central to fundamentalism are these five doctrines: 1) the innerancy and infallibility of the Bible; 2) the virgin birth and deity of Jesus; 3) the substitutionary atonement; 4) the literal, physical resurrection of Jesus Christ; 5) the literal, physical return of Christ.*  These are all good doctrines. Standing up for these five doctrines is very admirable.

     Throughout the past century, fundamentalism impacted society by standing up for morality and urging fellow fundamentalists to engage in political activism.  Within the United States, fundamentalists have impacted the political realm by their support of ultra conservative politicians such as Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush.  Currently, one of the most important political/moral battles fundamentalists face is the issue of abortion.  No matter what fundamentalists combat politically, they promote the Judeo-Christian foundation of morality. 

      There are a lot of things within fundamentalism that I agree with.  I agree with the  five main doctrines, standing up for morality, and preserving conservative Christian orthodoxy.  However, there are many negative sides that make me wary of associating myself with the title of "fundamentalist."  First of all, fundamentalism is known for its strong reactionary nature and exclusivity.  Fundamentalists have the tendency of separating and denying fellowship with anyone who does not agree with everything they believe.  This belief elitism divides the Church of Christ, and damages fellowship.

       Calling oneself a fundamentalist carries a lot of harmful and unnecessary connotations.  For instance, most people think fundamentalists are uneducated and unintelligent.  Fundamentalism also brings up images of riots and hate crimes like those of the congregation of Westboro Baptist Church and the radical fundamentalist Muslims. 

      Even though there are a lot of admirable things about true Christian fundamentalism, there is so much that disfigures the the name of fundamentalism.  Because of this, orthodox Christianity may be hindered by association with fundamentalism.  Therefore, we should seek to use different names to describe a conservative orthodox Christianity.  There is too much to lose by connecting ourselves to religious fundamentalism. 

    
Sources:

* David L. Smith.  A Handbook of Contemporary Theology: Tracing Trends and Discerning Directions in Today's Theological Landscape. Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 1992. pp. 22.